http://teennewspaper.com

Comments Off

Should we have urine testing for Welfare applicants?

Category : Teen Health

Like a lot of people in the United States, I have a job. I operate, they pay me. I spend my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as they see fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am needed to pass a random urine test, which I have no difficulty with. And the main cause I have no difficulty with a drug test is since I have nothing to hide. What I do have a difficulty with is the distribution of my taxes to folks who are carrying out drugs and in no way have to pass an urine test.

Shouldn’t 1 have to pass an urine test to get a welfare check, simply because I have to pass 1 to earn it for them?

Please comprehend, I have no dilemma with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping an individual sit on their butt. Could you imagine how much cash the state would save if individuals had to pass an urine test to get a public assistance check?

A 1999 Michigan law known as for a pilot system of random substance abuse testing in at least three counties. Drug testing began at the starting of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a designated area of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit’s west side neighborhoods.

All the new applicants for that location had to provide an urine sample to officials or give up their correct to any government help. In addition, any applicants currently in the system had to submit to random testing.

A class action lawsuit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days prior to schedule testing. The suit charges that the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Two Michigan mothers and a Detroit organization (The Westside Mothers) had been named in the suit. The organization focuses on representing hundreds of welfare recipients and their households. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan says, “The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country can be subjected to a search by the government unless there is reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients could be poor, but that is not a crime not however, anyway.”

I have spoken to a quantity of individuals in individual and on forums about their thoughts and the ones that oppose this have the same stance, that it is unconstitutional. In my opinion, it appears that I am not pushing random drug test onto any random citizen. The welfare recipient chooses to get help from the government. So just like submitting paperwork, you should submit an urine sample. An additional stance folks talk about is false positives. Nicely if they claim false positive, then do a hair follicle test.

If urine test are unconstitutional, then scrap the entire welfare system. Let your voice be heard on Political Majority.com.

For more info: pass drug test talk

Comments Off

The Connection Between Homeless Children and Child Drug Abuse-00-7321

Category : Cool Videos

According to the Make Runaways Safe campaign, approximately half of all male and female prisoners above the age of 16 ran away from their homes when they were still children. Indeed, child drug abuse victims can also experience a higher incidence of school exclusions, alcohol abuse and drug misuse, which have proven links to social and economic problems later in life. A quarter of homeless children who run away from home before they are teenagers, while one in 10 homeless youngsters run away before their tenth birthday.

Certain groups of children who are more susceptible to becoming homeless also include:

More than a third of young people who have either used drugs or alcohol or who have been involved with the police.
Children aged 13 to 15, which is the most common age at which a child becomes homeless.
Girls, who are more likely to be homeless than boys.
Children in care, who three times as likely to run away (although comprising just two per cent of all child runaways).
Children who consider themselves as having learning difficulties or disabilities, which represents approximately one fifth of all young runaways.
Children whose parents have either divorced or separated are three times as likely to run away.
Children living with a single parent are twice as likely to attempt to run away at some point during their childhood.

Supporting young homeless substance abuse victims

Providing an effective safety net for homeless children who have been the victims of child drug abuse is a comprehensive strategy. Charities need to work very closely with all local authorities to establish each child’s background, their motives for running away from home, risk factors that could compromise their health and safety and the level of support they will require in the future.

With more than 100,000 children running away in the UK each year, ensuring that the welfare of each homeless child remains a top priority is the best means to tackle this problem. This helps every agency and professional in the country working with child drug abuse victims to provide the highest standards of care through a coordinated national support network.

Drug abuse can often be a factor in runaway cases. The aim of The Children

Comments: (0)

Michael W. Miller Warns of Link Between Teenage Depression, Drug Use

Category : Teen

Michael W. Miller Warns of Link Between Teenage Depression, Drug Use










New York, New York (PRWEB) April 04, 2012

It is common knowledge that both depression and alcohol use are significant problems amongst teenagers, particularly those in junior and senior high school. According to a new study, however, these two issues might actually be connected. New research indicates that high school-aged students who exhibit symptoms of depression are more likely than their peers to turn to drinking and smoking. The study has won the praise of Michael W. Miller, a neuroscientist whose own research has yielded similar findings.

In fact, the study is not limited to alcohol and cigarettes. It also reveals that teens showing signs of depression are more likely to use marijuana and hard drugs throughout their high school years and beyond. The conclusion of the study is that the signs of depression first reveal themselves during the teenage years—and teenagers turn to drug use and drinking as a form of self-medication.

Michael W. Miller agrees. The neuroscientist praises the new study, and says its findings are convincing. “This insightful study provides intriguing data supporting the concept that substances are used by young teenagers to self-medicate for depression,” notes Michael W. Miller. He goes on to point out that the data is consistent with one of his own, previous studies. “This is consistent with the so-called ‘alcoholism generator hypothesis’ that implies early substance abuse by teenagers is primed by fetal exposures.”

Michael W. Miller makes these comments with reference to his own 2006 study, which indicates that fetal development can make an individual more or less prone to substance abuse as a teenager.

The main thrust of this new study, however, pertains to the relationship between depression symptoms and substance abuse—and particularly of the role of drugs and alcohol as means of self-medication. The study confirms that “those individuals who had more depressive symptoms in ninth grade reported faster increases than their peers in smoking, marijuana, and hard drug use… across the high school years.” As the study notes, all of these substances are known to have mood-enhancing effects. Their use for self-medication, then, is easy to fathom.

ABOUT:

Michael W. Miller, Ph.D. is a distinguished neuroscientist who has taught neuroscience and biology at many prestigious universities, including Tulane University, the University of Iowa, and the State University of New York. Dr. Miller has conducted seminal research into the effects of alcohol on brain development for more than 30 years.




















Vocus©Copyright 1997-, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







More Depression In Teenagers Press Releases

Comments Off

Young Runaways and Drug Abuse-00-7287

Category : Cool Videos

While each runaway is unique, there are four facts about the pattern of young runaways:

1.Many children run away repeatedly.
2.A considerable number run away for long periods.
3.Many are forced to leave home; they may have been physically ejected or verbally ordered to go.
4.The majority of runaways are not reported to the police as missing.

The report shows that drug abuse and drinking is often linked to runaway cases by parents, carers or young people.

It is noted that girls are more likely to run away from home than boys and overall, and the most common age for children to run away is between 13 and 15.

It was also revealed that children under the age of 13 are also prone to running away – a quarter of runaways do so before the age of 13, and one in 10 before the age of 10.

Children in care are shown to be three times more likely to run away.

The investigation shows that often children experiencing problems in school tend to run away. Difficulty with learning puts pressure on children who then decide to run away.

Many children come from homes where parents themselves have drink or drug dependency issues. This can contribute to a runaway child experimenting with dangerous substances themselves.

It is also evident that children who come from homes with broken relationships have a higher number of runaways or have had a previous attempt at running away from home.

Young runaways are less likely to feel that their life is not worth living, but are more likely to feel alone and depressed.

One in six child runaways said they slept rough, while one in eight said they resorted to begging or stealing. It was also recorded that the older ages of the demographic were less likely to seek help or were untrusting of professionals. Eight out of 10 children will not look for help but those who do will ask friends or relatives.

Drug abuse issues are often linked to runaway cases. The Children

Comments Off

Young Runaways and Drug Abuse-00-7287

Category : Cool Videos

While each runaway is unique, there are four facts about the pattern of young runaways:

1.Many children run away repeatedly.
2.A considerable number run away for long periods.
3.Many are forced to leave home; they may have been physically ejected or verbally ordered to go.
4.The majority of runaways are not reported to the police as missing.

The report shows that drug abuse and drinking is often linked to runaway cases by parents, carers or young people.

It is noted that girls are more likely to run away from home than boys and overall, and the most common age for children to run away is between 13 and 15.

It was also revealed that children under the age of 13 are also prone to running away – a quarter of runaways do so before the age of 13, and one in 10 before the age of 10.

Children in care are shown to be three times more likely to run away.

The investigation shows that often children experiencing problems in school tend to run away. Difficulty with learning puts pressure on children who then decide to run away.

Many children come from homes where parents themselves have drink or drug dependency issues. This can contribute to a runaway child experimenting with dangerous substances themselves.

It is also evident that children who come from homes with broken relationships have a higher number of runaways or have had a previous attempt at running away from home.

Young runaways are less likely to feel that their life is not worth living, but are more likely to feel alone and depressed.

One in six child runaways said they slept rough, while one in eight said they resorted to begging or stealing. It was also recorded that the older ages of the demographic were less likely to seek help or were untrusting of professionals. Eight out of 10 children will not look for help but those who do will ask friends or relatives.

Drug abuse issues are often linked to runaway cases. The Children

Comments Off

Young Runaways and Drug Abuse-00-7287

Category : Cool Videos

While each runaway is unique, there are four facts about the pattern of young runaways:

1.Many children run away repeatedly.
2.A considerable number run away for long periods.
3.Many are forced to leave home; they may have been physically ejected or verbally ordered to go.
4.The majority of runaways are not reported to the police as missing.

The report shows that drug abuse and drinking is often linked to runaway cases by parents, carers or young people.

It is noted that girls are more likely to run away from home than boys and overall, and the most common age for children to run away is between 13 and 15.

It was also revealed that children under the age of 13 are also prone to running away – a quarter of runaways do so before the age of 13, and one in 10 before the age of 10.

Children in care are shown to be three times more likely to run away.

The investigation shows that often children experiencing problems in school tend to run away. Difficulty with learning puts pressure on children who then decide to run away.

Many children come from homes where parents themselves have drink or drug dependency issues. This can contribute to a runaway child experimenting with dangerous substances themselves.

It is also evident that children who come from homes with broken relationships have a higher number of runaways or have had a previous attempt at running away from home.

Young runaways are less likely to feel that their life is not worth living, but are more likely to feel alone and depressed.

One in six child runaways said they slept rough, while one in eight said they resorted to begging or stealing. It was also recorded that the older ages of the demographic were less likely to seek help or were untrusting of professionals. Eight out of 10 children will not look for help but those who do will ask friends or relatives.

Drug abuse issues are often linked to runaway cases. The Children

Comment: (1)

Stuck Up Fuck Up – Teen Drug Abuse PSA

Category : Teen

This is a PSA I made for my video class. Apparently I look like I’m glorifying drug use but oh well. It was an excuse to do cool effects! The song is by Big chocolate and its called Stuck up fuck up. Dubstep is awesome. Anyways enjoy! Follow me on the twitter! www.twitter.com/dsquar3
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Comments Off

Obras sociales en la Argentina. una prepaga sobre alto valor aquí en el fabuloso territorio – planes de salud

Category : College News

Prepagas

La/s medicina prepaga en Argentina.
En el el desarrollo de la Tercera Conferencia Frecuentede Salud “Quo Vadis Salud” que organizó la Revista Médicos, la problemática del subsector de la medicina prepaga fue analizada por Pablo Giordano, titular de la Asociación de Entidades, gerente comercial corporativo. El debate fue coordinado . Prepaga medicas.

Prepaga medicas
Para la apertura del análisis de la situación de las prepagas, Carlos Abad, titular de Medical Brokers, hizo una defensa de este subsector enfatizando “que tiene recursos propios y que da trabajo sin la ayuda del Estado”. “Y sin embargo, tanto en los medios como a nivel general, estas empresas tienen mala fama”, remarcó Abad -prepaga medica.

Prepagas.
Todo ello y en principio con vistas a la desregulación de las obras sociales este proceso se amplió a partir del dictado de los decretos 446/00 1140/00 y 1305/00 por los cuales se permitió la incorporación voluntaria de las entidades como agentes del seguro de salud a comienzos del corriente año se suspendió la aplicación de los mismos a través del decreto 377- prepagas en capital federal.

Existen dos tipos de propuestas de regulación de las entidades: aquellas en el momento que son reguladas en tanto entidades prestadoras de servicios de salud, y aquellas otras que lo hacen en tanto entidades que pueden adherir al sistema de la seguridad social (durante medida en se levantara la suspensión antedicha). Es en este caso donde la heterogeneidad normativa debe de ser sometida an análisis.
En algunos casos, las condiciones impuestas por los proyectos legislativos en el funcionamiento de las EMP en el mercado de la salud son notoriamente diferentes respecto de las que les permitirían competir con las obras sociales. Vale citar como ejemplo el patrimonio neto. Mientras que los primeros establecen un patrimonio neto mínimo de $250.000 para las entidades existentes y de $500.000 para las a crearse, la resolución 246/2000 de la Superintendencia de Servicios de Salud determina los siguientes valores para las entidades que deseen constituirse en agentes de seguro: 1) $ 1.000.000 para la entidades con ámbito geográfico de prestación de servicios de salud en una jurisdicción provincial, 2) $ 2.000.000 para las que funcionen en nuestro Area Metropolitana o en dos jurisdicciones provinciales y 3) $ 3.000.000 para las que lo hagan en dos o más jurisdicciones provinciales o él Area Metropolitana y en una o más jurisdicciones provinciales.
La heterogeneidad normativa podría llegar a devenir en un intrincado marco regulatorio que impidiera el gran funcionamiento del sector, fundamentalmente para aquellas entidades que decidieran participar de ambos subsistemas (privado o de la seguridad social). Contrariamente, los requisitos impuestos debieran permitir regular homogéneamente, quiere decir: independientemente del sector él cual la entidad desee desarrollar su actividad. Esto evitaría, asimismo, profundizar aún más la declamada fragmentación institucional del sistema de salud argentino – cobertura medica.

Cabe señalar que, ese ejemplo citado, en ninguno de los casos se explicitan los criterios especialistasseleccionados para la determinación de unas cuantassumas. Esta escasez sobrepreciode explicitación se repite cuando se exigen otros requisitos de tareas, sean jurídicos, prestacionales o económicos, siendo que, a nuestro criterio, la definición de los mismos debiera formar parte de la propia precepto.

Prepaga medicas